Fraud Sentinel·Meridian BankLiveTue 12:41
Threat Pressure
The LandscapeMean adversary activity across the 7 F3 tactics shown below.
Net Exposureactivity × coverage gap
Where adversary activity meets your detection gap. Per-tactic exposure averaged across 7 F3 tactics.
13/ 100 · composite
= mean of the 7 per-tactic values below
Defense Evasion
30
Resource Development
26
Monetization
12
Initial Access
12
Positioning
12
Reconnaissance
0
Execution
0
each row = activity × (1 − coverage). hover for math.
Top driver: Defense Evasion — 60 activity × 50% coverage gap
Recent Signal Sources
Click pin or row to inspectHigh-risk originActive intelAnchor
7 sources monitoredRecent intel · 5
F3 Tactics — Adversary Pressure × Coverage
7 MITRE F3 tactics · click any to inspectSingle F3 taxonomy across the dashboard. Each card shows adversary activity on that tactic, our coverage of its techniques, and the resulting exposure (activity × coverage gap). Same 7 rows feed Net Exposure on the left and the detection table below.
Detection counts mapped row-for-row to the 7 tactics above — same taxonomy, different lens. Cards show pressure; this table shows what we caught.
F3 Detection Performance
7 MITRE F3 tactics · 24h counts| Tactic | Det | Resp | Coverage | Det · 7d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Reconnaissance TA0043 | 847 | 12ms | FULL | |
Resource Development TA0042 | 234 | 18ms | FULL | |
Initial Access TA0001 | 1,203 | 8ms | FULL | |
Defense Evasion TA0005 | 156 | 31ms | PART | |
PositioningF3 FA0001 | 89 | 22ms | PART | |
Execution TA0002 | 2,891 | 6ms | FULL | |
MonetizationF3 FA0002 | 412 | 14ms | PART |
Txns processed: 2,419,847↑
Active alerts: 23
Posture:ELEVATED